Who can actually decode the 1623 Shakespeare first folio “Digges poem”? No one.

Digges dedicatory poem to the first folio of Shakespeare plays, 1623:   see  https://books.google.com/books?id=Rt4VAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA401&dq=1623+shakespeare+digges&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAWoVChMIg6K4p8DCxwIVhTCICh0nUAND#v=onepage&q=1623%20shakespeare%20digges&f=false

……………………………………………………………

Mrs. Wells Gallup gives a version of the Digges dedicatory poem of 1623 in her own book:

https://books.google.com/books?id=Y6c3AAAAIAAJ&pg=PP15&lpg=PP15&dq=wells+gallup+digges+poem&source=bl&ots=i10S47RM24&sig=7dYQwgPEwB20k2QflmvtzmItfq4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAmoVChMI1arHxcHCxwIVzqKICh31DgTC#v=onepage&q=wells%20gallup%20digges%20poem&f=false

……………………………………………………………….

Now you have the 1623 Digges poem.  Notice the repetition five times of “thy” in the first sentence.  Do the typefaces appear different to you?  Notice the “E” letter thrice repeated in “TO THE MEMORIE”–do these typefaces appear different to you?  I have used tracing paper (and magnifying glass) to more closely study the various letters of the Digges poem; I do not discern two different/contrasting typefaces.  I have never heard of a single person that can decode two typefaces other than Wells Gallup–rather say, her claim so to do.  It is a far-flung joke/scam/fantasy traceable to Wells Gallup:  she “decodes” the word “thy” this way on her page 106 of Bi-lateral cypher, 1910:  first aaa, then bbb, then bbb, then aaa, then baa. She “decodes” the “E” of “TO THE MEMORIE” this way:  b, a, a.  “a” and “b” are her two differing typefaces–or so she imagines!!  See her “decoding” in her book:

https://books.google.com/books?id=Y6c3AAAAIAAJ&pg=RA1-PA106&dq=wells+gallup+digges+poem&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=3#v=onepage&q=wells%20gallup%20digges%20poem&f=false

………………………………………………………………………………………….

One more matter:  Hinman argues (in 1953 Shakespeare Quarterly) “that the First Folio text is only an abstraction, since individual copies in fact present us with a great variety of different texts.”  see https://books.google.com/books?id=h0ilBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA225&lpg=PA225&dq=wells+gallup++bilateral+code&source=bl&ots=UhXeM07bGC&sig=eStwYuYqMaaoc8eqLRuodaCxmcU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAmoVChMIz5ykzs3CxwIVgZWICh1CKA63#v=onepage&q=wells%20gallup%20%20bilateral%20code&f=false

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

1)  Furthermore, as was discovered in the 1890s in two separate ciphers–a word-cipher* and a bi-literal cipher** embedded in the type of the original printings of the Shakespeare folios–Francis Bacon was the author of the plays            -Messenger E C Prophet:  Lost Teachings of Jesus, v. 2, S. U. Press, Jan. 1986, p. 219.
(Dr. Owen’s claim in 1893-4) ; **(Wells Gallup’s claim from 1899-1916)
…………………
2)  The same ciphers which run throughout the Shakespeare plays also run through Francis Bacon’s own works and those of many of his circle of friends.  Both ciphers contain his true life story      -Messenger E C Prophet:  Lost Teachings of Jesus, v. 3, S. U. Press, Jan. 1994, p. 193.
……………………
3)  Some even claim, based on ciphers embedded in the type of the original printings of the Shakespeare Folios, that Francis Bacon was the real author of the plays      -Messenger E C Prophet et alia:  Saint Germain’s Prophecy for the New Millennium, 1999, p. 384.
Please note:  at 3) above the Messenger appears to have plainly backed off from her several previous emphatic statements on a supposed decoding of Shakespeare.   -R., Mt. Shasta

………………………………..

now, how about a real biography of Viscount Francis Bacon?   https://vidzhaya.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/of-francis-bacon/

………………………………………………………………………………………….

God will not seem so remote–nor His will when men are able to envision it as an extension                 of their own consciousness from present standards to those that are still higher.  But when men consider their own standards to be above the stars then like an animalistic cult they grunt and groan, dance in circles and dissipate their energies in vanity….

To improve the quality of the reflecting mirror (of consciousness) is essential; in this way consciousness itself as a chalice can be improved so as to contain not only qualitatively but quantitatively more of the will of God.        -Morya:  Pearls of Wisdom  12:13

12:1

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s